Tech Talk: All you need to know about the new F1 power units, but are too afraid to ask 10 March, 2014 Ferrari vs Renault vs Mercedes In 2014, Formula One will undergo a major change, the most significant alteration to its technical regulations in the history of the sport. The introduction of a new 1.6 litre, turbo-charged V6 power unit, relying heavily on hybrid technologies, aims to place the world’s foremost single-seat racing series at the cutting edge of automotive technology development, while at the same time preserving the culture of innovation and capacity to thrill that have been at the heart of the sport since its earliest days. The changes are comprehensive, and so via straightforward explanations and with the help of insights from FIA Head of Powertrain Fabrice Lom, this guide has been assembled as a handy guide to how Formula One will race in 2014 and beyond. Fabrice Lom The goal Since the inception of the Formula One World Championship in 1950, the sport has always sought to innovate, constantly pushing the technological boundaries in order to find the quickest route to victory. F1 has frequently pioneered technology that has been successfully transferred to everyday transport. The new regulations introduced to F1 seek to once again bring this spirit of advancement to the forefront of competition, aligning F1 with real world engine development. As FIA Head of Powertrain Fabrice Lom explains: “It is vital to use our resources with care. The game is still to go fast, but to go fast spending less – less money and less energy. This ratio, between result (speed) and consumption (finance, fuel and resources) is called efficiency. In future, the best car in F1 will be the most efficient. This is what the new power unit regulations are designed to promote.” Ensuring efficiency At the heart of the new power unit and the quest for efficiency is a move away from reliance on traditional power sources and an increase in the use of energy recovery. Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems, technologies that harvest energy in the car’s braking phase that can then be deployed at will, have been utilised in F1 for some years. The 2014 regulations, however, take this technology to another level. While up until now KERS produced 60 kW (80 hp), in future the best ERS will produce 120 kW (160 hp). This increase in capability has been made possible via a combination of a more potent KERS and a secondary recovery system that harvests energy from the heat in exhaust gasses, a system that can be referred to as ERS-H. Energy Recovery System As mentioned, KERS itself has been refined with a more powerful generator unit, dubbed the MGU-K (Motor Generator Unit – Kinetic) and via a more automated and thus more efficient management system. The second unit, the MGU-H (Motor Generator – Heat), is connected to the turbine of the new powerplant’s turbocharger (which return to F1 for the first time since 1998) where it harvests exhaust heat, which is turned into energy to boost the engine (as with a classic turbocharger) but also into electrical energy. This type of recovery is expected to be very efficient and is expected to allow for energy recovery three times greater than the larger KERS. Also in 2014, engine capacity will be reduced from 2.4 litres to 1.6 l in a V6 configuration. Direct engine injection has been specified, making the new units 1.6 l V6 DI turbocharged engines. The complete assembly of 1.6-litre turbocharged engine, KERS (now called ERS-K), ERS-H, the required Energy Store and the associated electronic control elements gives rise to the new term Power Unit. Renault F1 V6 turbo engine Promoting efficiency At its core the idea is straightforward: allocate the same amount of fuel to each car (100 kg) and the most efficient team will extract the most power over time from this fuel. Fuel flow will also be restricted to 100 kg/h. This limitation will ensure a certain amount of control over the maximum power of the engines. F1 engineers have a great capacity for innovation and power is likely to increase as quickly as efficiency. How it works The new Power Unit is a complex assembly and the management of the unit is equally complicated. However, a lot more freedom has been given to the engineers to control the Power Unit in order to make using it as simple as possible for the driver. Indeed, utilising a 2014 Power Unit should be less complicated for the driver than driving the current engine as, for example, the new ERS-K will be automatic, unlike the old KERS. The manner in which the different elements of the Power Unit interact is also being regulated. Again, in order to promote efficiency, energy flow is subject to the most regulation. The main principles are as follows: All the recovered power released to the wheels must be through the single MGU-K situated at the rear of the car. A limited amount of energy can be stored in and released from the Energy Store to the MGU-K. This, coupled with the limitation on weight, will prevent an overemphasis on the costly development of batteries, super capacitors or flywheels. An unlimited amount of energy can be exchanged between the MGU-K and the MGU-H or the MGU-H and the Energy Store. In other words, the energy recovered from the turbocharger is ‘free’. This is to promote the development of this technology, which could have future road car applications Performance The new Power Units are expected to produce more power than the V8 powerplants used until 2014 and this is likely to increase with time. In terms of raw power, they will lack nothing in comparison with the engines they are replacing. Additionally, the new units will consume 35% less fuel than the current V8s. This is guaranteed, as the total fuel consumption during a race will be limited to 100kg. The V8s use approximately 150 kg. Having said that, at start of the new formula’s life cycle car performance will be lower than at the end of the life cycle of the V8 units. This is largely due to the increased weight of the new Power Unit and changes to the sport’s regualtions covering car aerodynamics. It is expected that this will change as development continues. Cost concerns Development of such a complex new Power Unit inevitably gives rise to questions of cost. A number of limitations have been built into the regulations to help keep costs down, while at the same time promoting the efficiency at the heart of the new formula. These limitations can be split into four main categories: number of parts, technology, limits on the use of certain elements and development restrictions. Limitations in number of parts In recent years the number of V8 engines available to each driver was limited to eight per season. The number of KERS units was unlimited, as was the number of control electronics. In 2014, the number of power units will be limited to five per season, per driver and this will be further reduced in 2015 to four units. This not only includes the engines but also the turbochargers, the energy store, the MGU-K, MGU-H and the control electronics. Limitations of the technology New materials and complex systems could help efficiency but these could also increase costs. As such, the new regulations impose some limitations. These include: The petrol engine element of the power unit must remain conventional. No exotic materials are allowed. Ignition must stay standard for example. Only one turbocharger is allowed and it must be a simple single stage unit with no variable turbine. Use of exotic materials is not allowed. Mercedes V6 turbo F1 engine Limitations placed on individual elements Restricting how Power Unit elements can be used will limit extreme and expensive solutions. For instance, the engine’s main dimensions are standardised (including capacity, bore, number of cylinders, type of turbocharger). Also, the maximum revs of the main components (engine, MGU-H and K) are limited, and the weight of the battery must be within a certain range (20 to 25 kg). Limitation of development To control costs over the life cycle of the new formula, development will be subject to a series of restrictions over a seven-year period. These restrictions have been developed to form a defined path that will allow manufacturers to fully develop the Power Units. “The most efficient way to reduce development cost is to stop it. This is known as a ‘freeze’,” explains Lom. “This was partially done with the V8 engines. It works well with mature technologies but could be risky when imposed on new technologies, as it can lead to a team and / or manufacturer whose initial product is superior, leading to them achieving a dominant position from the outset and this domination would then naturally persist for the duration of any development freeze. Therefore, we have set out a schedule that will keep costs down but still permit development.” The development cycle is scheduled according to an available set of elements that can be developed each year. The Power Unit is divided into families of functions, with each family being given a certain importance, labelled as category 1, 2 or 3 components. For example, the pistons are ranked 2, while the ignition system is ranked 1. The complete Power Unit is made up of the sum of these ranked items, with the complete Power Unit being represented by the total number, 66. Each year, each Power Unit manufacturer will be allowed to of the engine they wish to develop and will spend a set ‘budget’ of ‘tokens’. This development budget decreases each year across the seven-year schedule. For 2015 the budget available to teams is 32 tokens (close to 50% of possible development) but for 2018 the budget drops to 15 tokens (less than 25% of possible development).choose what parts The price of change Inevitably, altering the specification of the powerplants used in Formula One comes at a price. Change costs more than stability. However, while the cost of initial development of the new Power Units will be significant it will inevitably decrease as the unit reaches maturity. “What is often forgotten is the initial development cost of the V8,” says Lom. “We are far away from that period now but the cost of developing the new Power Units is no more impactful than that of developing the V8. We have to accept that these new Power Units are young and that the initial development cost, which is substantial, will impact upon the price in the first years.” The price of the last V8 engines did not reflect the true cost of those power plants. The most recent prices were imposed in 2008 as part of a cost-cutting exercise in the sport, with the reduction being accepted by manufacturers even though it did not cover the cost of production. In the current economic climate and with fewer manufacturers involved in the sport than in 2008, this model is not sustainable. V8 engines are today becoming less relevant to most of the engine manufacturers who are large producers of cars with six, four or even three-cylinder engines. For these manufacturers, continuing with the V8 could have put at risk their future participation in the sport. “It is also important that the balance between the cost and the potential marketing value of the Power Unit is taken into consideration,” says Lom. “It could be that a Power Unit manufacturer sees the sponsorship of a team that uses its engine as relevant to its marketing plans. Additionally, the new image of sustainability provided by the new Power Unit may also attract a number of new sponsors to the sport.” Turbos of the previous era qwere spectacular when they blew up – here on Jacques Laffite’s Ligier JS27 Super sonics? One of the main talking points surrounding the new Power Units has been the sound they make. Some have fixated on the idea that the noise made by current F1 is part of the allure and while the sonic signature is certainly part of the thrill it is but one element of the sport’s appeal, allied to technical innovation, glamour, skill and heroism – all contribute to the ‘noise’ that constantly surrounds the sport. Having said that, it is true that the 2014 Power Units will make less noise than their current counterparts. However, it is worth putting this decrease into perspective. Intensity of sound F1 engine manufacturers estimate that the intensity of sound of the F1 powerplants with the current V8s is around 145dB. With the new units it is expected to be around 134dB. Quality of sound “Quality of sound is a very difficult thing to assess, as we all have different taste,” says Lom. “Some like rock, others classic music. In 1988, V6 turbo F1 engines were revving lower and had less capacity. Ayrton Senna and Alain Prost both had fans in those days and the show, as far as we remember, was quite good.” The delta of 11db, according to the physics of attenuation of sound in air, is equivalent to 2.5m if you are at 1m distance from the car, meaning that the difference will be hardly heard in the garage. If you are 15m from the car, it attenuates to 35m – that roughly represents the difference you can hear from seating in the first row to seating in the last row of a grandstand. The race is on! This, then, is Formula One for 2014 and the years to come. It is a sport where speed remains at the heart of the matter, with drivers still seeking to maximise the performance available from the machine at hand. But, it is also a sport where the traditional pursuit of technical excellence has been reinvented for the 21st century. The engineering challenge now is to go as fast as possible while consuming as little fuel as possible. It’s a task that will call for true inspiration and innovation and which will require strategic brilliance on the pit wall and supreme intelligence and skill at the wheel. The game has changed but the thrill remains the same. Tweet Related NewsFIA limit use of pit to driver communicationsIn-depth interview with F1 race director Charlie WhitingRed Bull to ditch nose camera trickTodt: We owe Ayrton and Roland both a profound debt of gratitudeJean Todt’s FIA Chief of Staff responds to Inside Line open letterDecision on Red Bull Melbourne disqualification appeal on TuesdayRed Bull taking new evidence to appeal in ParisTodt: I don’t have the power to slow Mercedes down, other teams must catch upFIA clamps down on fuel flow sensor modificationTodt: I do not want Formula 1 economy runs and we can look to making it noisier Michel Weij Spin. ianchesterton total spin. Talk about controlling spending but doing this at the same time. These guys all sound like a bunch of politicians. Carbisc “which will require strategic brilliance on the pit wall and supreme intelligence and skill at the wheel” great line and its how it be will from now on in F1 RBC We made the engines cost less, by having a limited number of engines per year. This cost the manufacturers hundreds of millions of dollars to create this reliability. Which means we didn’t save money at all… Ooops. Good thing we are the FIA and above criticism from anyone inside the sport. nowhereman FIA -Fix It Again so we can mess up a great sport. nowhereman Two times we had to go over there an bail their butts out of two wars. I understand why now..