Red Bull baffled by Monza gearbox problems reveals Newey 10 September, 2013 Adrian Newey Red Bull departed from Monza baffled, after winner Sebastian Vettel and and third placed Mark Webber nursed gearbox problems throughout the race weekend. “We already had problems on Friday,” world championship leader Vettel is quoted by Germany’s Auto Motor und Sport. Before the race, the team had to open the gearbox and replace damaged parts, and during the Italian Grand Prix, both drivers were instructed to ‘short-shift’. The drivers were also told to select a ‘rain-mode’ setting, delivering smoother gear changes, which explains why Fernando Alonso remarked on Vettel’s flashing red tail light. Red Bull was alerted to the problem after the telemetry showed high oil temperatures. “Frankly, it’s a mystery,” admitted car designer Adrian Newey. “Monza is particularly hard on the gearbox, but we’ve never had a problem like this,” he added. “With Mark it was serious, while for [Sebastian] it was more of a precaution. It is possible that we will open his gearbox in the factory and everything is fine.” Team boss Christian Horner added: “Caterham uses an identical gearbox and had no problems.” (GMM) Subbed by AJN. Tweet Related NewsRed Bull accept damage limitation at MonzaRed Bull: Fifth and sixth was the absolute optimumRed Bull: No great surprise for us to be strugglingRed Bull drivers practice day report from MonzaRenault: Timesheets don’t tell the full storyVettel says chassis change is normalItalian Grand Prix: Red Bull drivers review MonzaVettel to get another new chassis for MonzaWebber: Sebastian won the race and the atmosphere is not completely correctVettel: The more booing we get the better we have done, it’s normal Faceman Gee do ya think the giant flat spots on Vettels tyres and Webber unbalanced wing had anything to do with it? LOL warren why was there no gearbox penalty if they had to open the gearbox?? Dr. Azlan @warren What does the rulebook say on that one? jl @warren between qualifying and race if F1 team open gearbox there would be penalty. but before that, not. Tom They didn’t get a penalty because they were albe to proove that there was damage inside. reza moghaddam Please get aware of………..!ATENTION PLEASE !!! AN IMPORTANT INVENTION !?…. HAPPENED !!?? As far……..I’d like not to spare your time : I’ll try to explain the matter in a very short , I am a retired one in a 70 years of old ;and always have been intrested on new technologies !? and had had some invents in the past too!……..? during the last 20 years I have spent all my life time to bring up (Free Energy…perpetual motion divice )!!! But, Never Succeeded yet !..of course l’ll be following the problem to the end of my life !! Because it’s my greatest wish to over come to this impossibie RIVAL SUBJECT ??……….So : …in- fact; ,what I am going to aware you of, on this issue; is that: I never was trying to invent any kinds of Gearboxes!; But, about 10 years ago; during to follow above mentioned subject,when I was testing one of my prototypes;… suddenly I came to a godsend and graceful matter : …..which ,showed the event ends to a REVOLUTIONARY GEARBOX !!? which, never is made yet !.. OKEY !! NOW : you are right to ask : why have’nt you offerd the envent until now !? IT’S 10 years passed !? my answer is clear, I had a more important matter on my back ward (perpetual mo……! )my main aim ! which; sorry to say haven’t succeeded yet ! you should go on !! .I always say to myself .?!…… Alright ..I said i am 70 of years old; and may be never over come to my main aim: therefor at last, I decided to offer what: I have in my BAG! yet !! hoping to recompons some of my losses of : time / mony/ and sufferings/ in the past . I’m betting to be certifiable on the whole of my professed. And now ready to affering the NEW METHOD OF GEARBOX which never is made yet ; sure: it will abolish the previose planning methods; cause of it’s so high advantages and also technical specifications ! …………………….. WHAT IS THIS HEAVY DUTY GEARBOX’s CHRACTERISTICS ? 1_ the kind of G… is DIRECT AXEL. 2 _ It needs,only,3 moving gears to assemble the device! : to ( convert or reduce)RPMs Even from 1 to 100 or more! that means the object !! 3 _It’s weight/ size/diameter/mass/ will be at least 5 times less; in compare by the- existing ones ;with the same rate!!?? and also you’ll have less shotage and energy drop; So will get more power too! because of using less gears !…….. 4_ In attention to above mentioned benefits:even it could be replaced with [ the hydrolic powering system’s needs!, cause of it’s SO/ low price and easy high RPM reduceing!? Gooooooooood !!!!!!!!! At the end: this old one! have’nt much time to follow to get a patent ………! So I’ve decided to get in touch with some gaint companies;in the field and sell the matter’s technical- science DIRECT to them?……………..Please contact for more info; and other problems.