Protest looms over Rosberg’s Monaco victory after secret tyre test 26 May, 2013 Nico Rosberg leads Sebastian Vettel during the Monaco GP Red Bull made a formal protest at the Monaco Grand Prix on Sunday after it emerged that Mercedes, who swept the front row in qualifying for the race , carried out a secret tyre test with Pirelli last week in Barcelona. Red Bull team principal Christian Horner, who found out ‘second hand’ only on Saturday night, suggested Mercedes had gained an unfair advantage and said his team had sought a clarification of the rules. “We feel it’s not in line with the rules, so that’s why we’ve protested before the race here. We just want clarity,” he told Sky Sports television. “I think it’s important (that it) be brought to a head. I don’t think we’re the only team that feels that way.” The Formula One regulations ban in-season testing but Pirelli said their contract stipulated that they could do 1,000-km private tests with a ‘representative’ car and the three days in Spain were legal. The clash between the regulations and the clause in Pirelli’s contract appeared to create a grey area. Red Bull’s Helmut Marko and Christian Horner not happy “What’s disappointing is it has been done in not a transparent manner that a three-day test has taken place with a current car running on tyres that are going to be used at the next grand prix,” an unhappy Horner told reporters earlier. Irrespective of what you call it, that’s testing.” Mercedes GP non-executive chairman Niki Lauda said, however, that the team had obtained permission from the governing International Automobile Federation (FIA). “It is very simple. We were asked by Pirelli, we asked the FIA: ‘Are we allowed to do the test?’ The FIA confirmed it and said ‘yes’ and so therefore we did the test. We think other teams have been asked too,” he said. “Mercedes did nothing wrong – they asked the right people for permission. We asked the FIA, the FIA checked it legally and advised us we could do it so we can’t do any better.” Pirelli motorsport head Paul Hembery, already under fire from Red Bull over the quick-wearing current tyres, said the test in Barcelona after the Spanish Grand Prix had not been the first of its kind. “We’ve done it before with another team and we’ve asked another team to do some work as well,” he said. Paul Hembery Hembery denied that Mercedes, who have struggled with tyre wear during races despite having now racked up four pole positions in a row, could have gained any competitive advantage. “Absolutely not, no. Because it’s no relevance to what’s happening here,” he told Reuters. Horner, whose cars qualified on the second row behind the Mercedes duo of Nico Rosberg on pole and Lewis Hamilton alongside, was more sceptical about that. “Well, they’ve both cars on the front row of the grid so it’s not hurt,” he said. “There is confusion between what is contractually permissible, and what a team is allowed to do in the sporting regs,” he said. “It’s a situation we need clarification on.” Hembery said he did not know whether Mercedes had tested with this year’s car and the rain-affected test in Barcelona had been 90 percent aimed at the 2014 tyres. “We were looking at next year’s solutions and trying a variety of different (things)… Mercedes haven’t got a clue what on earth we were testing in reality,” said Hembery. Asked why the other teams had not been told in advance, Hembery suggested that would have been counter-productive. “You know in Formula One that when you start talking about something six months could pass before you found a solution,” he said. “There’s also another point of looking at it… that things take far too long. In reality sometimes you just have to get on and do it.” (Reuters) Related NewsHamilton: Nico and I spoke, we’re cool, still friends #noproblemHakkinen unimpressed with Hamilton’s behaviourRosberg won battle of mind games in Monaco says MassaLauda: Hamilton’s behaviour bad for the Mercedes brandButton: Hamilton will come back stronger than everLauda: You have to be a bastard to win in Formula 1Hamilton: Nico is not my friend, we are colleaguesMercedes: We will enjoy this momentHamilton: The battle between Nico and me is fierceHas Hamilton declared war on Rosberg after Qualifying drama? Steve These anti red Bull hit pieces are getting tedious. Ferrari and Red Bull both made a formal protest about the illegal tyre testing. By the time the press get done with the issue it’s “Red Bull trying to get their way with Pirelli!!!” Steve “We’ve done it before with another team and we’ve asked another team to do some work as well” Which other team are Pirelli working with? Ferrari? Steve “Hembery said he did not know whether Mercedes had tested with this year’s car” That’s a startling admission, isn’t it? Since testing with this years cars is forbidden? Also, one claim I’ve seen is that this test was allowed because of “safety” issues with this years tyres – but Hembery claims here that the test involved next years tyres. Which is it? Not Bernie I’ve no problem with Pirelli testing tyres if it brings F1 back to what it should be about – The best racing hard against each other. What we have just now is teams worried about wearing their tyres out too quickly. It’s like your granddad keeping his sofa in it’s original wrapping as he worries about wearing it out. Where I do have a problem is with fairness and transparency. That the FIA haven’t been able to clear up what was being tested, and why, is very worrying. The FIA should be stating what the objective to this test was. How Mercedes was chosen as the test team. They should clarify which specification of tyres were tested and if they were on a current car or not. And if it’s current tyres on the current car then why when this is clearly against the sporting regulations, and fairness to other teams. jurrabi It’s just stupid to blame the test for Mercedes Victory. It was clear before Monaco that Mercedes was quick in qualifying. The rhythm they showed at the race it’s also consistent with what they’ve done before. But even with that slow pace, due to Monaco’s characteristics, they were capable of keeping Red Bull at bay. To know if the test was a real advantage we’ll have to wait to Canada. The only thing RedBull (and all others) regret is that they weren’t the chosen ones.