Red Bull ‘rubber nose’ a false alarm claim experts 9 November, 2012 Nov.9 (GMM) Three leading specialist publications have played down the rubber front wing Red Bull saga. Recent video footage depicted the Adrian Newey-penned RB8 with a decidedly bendy front nose tip, causing some outlets and fans to question the legality of the apparently ‘rubber’ construction. But writing in Italy’s La Gazzetta dello Sport, journalist Andrea Cremonesi said that “according to the FIA, everything is in order”. “Word has arrived from Paris that the parts in question are not structural and are not subject to the rigid tests [that] other parts of the car are,” he explained. “The FIA have made it known that the ‘soft nature’ of the nose is what is required in order to avoid dangerous consequences should the cone come into contact with the side of another car,” Cremonesi explained. Tobias Gruner, formerly a journalist for Auto Motor und Sport, has a similar analysis. “We have shown the pictures to our technology experts,” he revealed. “The consensus: false alarm.” He said the nose tips are designed “always a little softer” in order to comply with the FIA’s crash tests, and that Vettel’s could have appeared even weaker during his first pitstop in Abu Dhabi due to the damage it had sustained. A report in Italy’s Autosprint added: “We have consulted with engineers at other teams and can now say that a certain degree of deformation in the ‘nose tip’ is acceptable. “That said, it is possible and indeed likely that Red Bull has gone further with its interpretation, because the deformable structure holds the front wing and can be used to get [the wing] closer to the ground. “Some technicians at the competition are convinced of this,” the report added. Subbed by AJN. Related NewsHungarian Grand Prix: Red Bull preview BudapestNo wings for Red Bull with new fuelAlonso: Ricciardo was very, very smart – a great fightRed Bull and Ferrari considered protesting MercedesRed Bull: The absolute maximum we could achieveRed Bull: It was again a difficult dayRed Bull: Tyres and weather will define the raceRicciardo: I give mine a kiss every night, with tongue!Vettel: F1 can be very cruelFans enjoyed Alonso battle despite whinging says Vettel Disgusted with 2012 Well, what do you know. Experts confirming that “fans and outlets” may have called cheat with no founding. Go figure. Its interesting to note that carbon fiber itself is soft like cloth. It’s how it is woven, coupled with the material used to impregnate it that makes it stiff as glass to as soft as rubber. You can make it stiff in one axis and flexible in another. You can make it twist along its axis, but resistant to bending forces. By overlaying it with other materials, or coating it, you can make it stay together to maintain alignment of forces without coming apart, or you can leave it in a state that decomposes structurally to absorb energy as it collapses. F1 cars are very complex structures using carbon, kevlar and other layers and fillers to create very specific resistance and reactive structures. They are not simplistic stiff boxes nose to tail, as that would be dangerous and fragile.